WHO RUNS THE MEDIA?
                             The Alarming Facts

  the Oscar-winning movie "Network", Howard Beale, the "mad prophet of the airwaves," became consmdwt he idea of exposing an insidious danger facing America: the take-over of American televisin y heArbs

     A terrifying prospect, isn't it?  The great power of the networks, a power tha inade alostevey home in the country, the primary source by which we learn about the world, beig doinatd an conrolld by a small, tightly-knit people whose attitudes and viewpoints may be danerousto ou wellbeing  Fredom of speech, the cornerstone of all our freedoms, would be worthless becaue realfreedo of spech ina modern world cannot be equated with having a few flyers printed  In 179 a hanbill wa equivaent to  TV program of today because it was the best media available  In tody's worl, comparng a lealet to aTV program is like comparing a skate board to a Cadilla.  If a sall groupcontrolle access t major elctronic and print media, it would be tantamount tono real fredom of exression.

    Indeed if the Amrican people were to awaken one morning and dscover Arabc names scrwled in TV redits as te overwhelmng majority of producers, directors, andscreenwriter of Americantelevision, hey would beieve, as the should, that the Arabs had taken oer televisionand as HowardBeale put it,they would be"Mad as hell nd not going to take it anymor."

     Howar Beale's nightare has been ralized.  A tin minority, themost cohesive and powerfu in the world, as come to competely dominate merican televison.  But it's nt the Arabs.

     Ionically, the sceenwriter of "Nework", Paddy Chaesky, was a membr and active suporter of that mnority and its poitical aspiration in America, the iddle East, and esewhere.  And "Nework" itsef was in complete greement with thos aspirations by idntifying Jewish enmies, the Arabs, a our nemies.

     "Netwrk" itself affords n excellent exampleof the bias of the ational media estabshment.  Even thoughJewish newspapers bost to their own peope of their dominancein the American ommuications media, s long as their dominnce continues, you wil not hear even a hin of the grea power thy possess inthe publishing and brodcasting industry.  Asa result, few American outsidethe media estalishmentare aware of the Jewishhegemony in the media.
                           elevision and Radio
    Television and radio ar our primary sources of nformation about the dai events and concerns of e world.  Through TV and adio we are bombarded at ome, in our autos, andat ork with a constant steamof information and new.  Additionally, the enterainment of movies ad dramaic series often hasboth sutle and overt politcal and social messages.  Een comedy is notimmune fromthis propagandizng.

     Eery American is ow familiar, for example, wih the Archie unker white steeotype.  A crde, rude, and ureasoning Arcie Bunker is used to show thesupposed imorality of opposin gun contrl, welfare, unrestrcted immigation, and race-mixing.  At th same tme, the show he appearsin promtes minority racism andZionism  The average American young peson atches over 16,000 hours ofteleision by the time he is 18. Cerainly, TV has a dramatic influeneon our attitudes, mores, and evnour political philosophies.

   The three major television netwok are ABC, CBS, and NBC.  ABC is u by Leonard Goldenson who has benCEO and Chairman of the Boar sine 1953.  CBS was lead by Willim Paey since 1948.  He still has mch sock and influence, but as replced as chairman by Thomas Wyan.  Heding the CBS-TV division is ames Roenfeld.  NBC is a ubsidiary f RCA, founded by David Sanoff, who ecame chairman of its boar of directrs in 1947.  he year 1970 aw the succession of hisson to the pot until 1975.  It is stil controlled y the Sanoff family.  NB has seen a successionof different charmen, including Herb Shlosser and FredSilerman.  Currently, rant Tinker is chairan of RCA's networksubsidiary, NBC.  Tiker is the only Getle of all those mentoned.

[Two picturs appear side-by-side n the booklet, wit the captions "AC BOSSGOLDENSON" and "CB BOSS PALEY".]

    One should not, howevr, get the impresion that NBC s dominatedby Gentiles.  Si out of the 12executive vice-presidents ar Jews.  The RC treasurer, elvin Cornfeld, nd the controler, Stanley oseberry, are also Jews.  The vce-chairman f NBC is Iwin Segelstein, and te former vic chairman,Richard Salant, is "General Advise" to NBC'stop manaement.  Furthermore, the pesident ofNBC Newsis Rueven Frank -- also a Jew.

     he only ther pivately owned national network s in rado, theMutual Broadcasting System (MBS), with 91 affiiate stations.  The president and chief xecutie oficer is Martin Rubenstein.  Of course, all hreeTVnetworks have radio networks also.

     ne my ope to escape the minority media control by tuinin his television to the Public Broadcasting Sst (PBS).  The current president is Lawrence Grossm a former NBC vice-president.  At a PBS convention 1976 he stated that even though most public roacsting supporters are upper-middle class whites "a ublic TV we must program for the disadvanaged,thedisenfranchised, the minorities."  NationalPubli Raio is the PBS version of that medium  It isheade by Frank Mankiewicz.  Both Mankiewicz ad Grossan ar Jews.

[Two pictures appear sie-by-sidewith th captions, "PBS BOSS GROSSMAN" and "NWS CZAR NWHOUSE"]

                               Newpapers

    Sixty-two million newspapers ar sold each ay.  Theyare divided into 1,74 different pulications. One might expect sheer numbers o preclude miority contrl, but the factsprove otherwise

     More tan half of the major dailiesin America are nder direct cntrol or inirect control of ews, a minoritythat makes up only 2.9% o the population. This situation as com about as a consequnce of the complee dependence of all paers on advertising evenue.  In everymjor city Jews have prdominance in the mecantile trade, whic includes department tores, large furitue outlets, discountstores, etc.  When lage advertisers coose to favor one newspper over anoter with heir business, tat newspaper prospers, nd its compettors suffer.  As Jewish mrcantile pwer has incresed there hasbeen a steady decline bot in the nubers of newspapers in majorcities long with a declin in competng Gentile papers -- primarly as aresult of selective advertisig byJewish merchants.

    Even th papers still under gentile onersip are so thoroughly dependent nJewish advertising revenue tat teir editorial and news reportin olicies are largely constrained yJewish likes and dislikes.  In h newspaper industry as elsewhere e who pays the piper calls th tun.

     As Jewish control over Aeican newspapers has grown, th newpaper business has lost is origial competitive, free-enterprisenatue and has become monopolitic.  I over 89% of Americancities whih have a local daily, there isno comptitor.  Only in 55 ofthe nations largest cities s there dailynewspaper competition, and inmost of thm it is nominal cmpetition beteen a morningand afternoon paer under the same ownership. For example,the New Orleas morning "TimesPicayune"and the afternoon "tates-Item", along with 26 ther dailies and21 Sundaypapers, are owned b the ewish Newhouse family.
     The Newhouse family lso owns the 20 magzinesof the Conde Nast Grou "Glamour", "Mademoiselle" "Vogue", "House and Gardn," "Bride's", "Self",ad 14 others); Random Hosebooks (Alfred A. Knopf, Bllantine, Vintage Books,Pantheon Books, Modern ibary, and Fawcett Boks); anumber of TV and radio sations; some 20 cable-T systems, and the Sundy suppement "Parade"with a cirulation of 22 million cpies a week.

     Becuse of the local monoolies of te sort exrcised by the ewhouses in a score ofAmerican cities, and y others elsewhere,  newspaper edior my print what he plases (or what his empoyers and advertiser wish him to print)without fear of coradiction by a compettor.  It is the lackof effective compettion that has resuted in the press ecomig for all practical urposes an instrumet of Jewish policy

     The "New Yrk Times" is theunofficialnews, social, fashin, entertainment, ultural, and poliical guide of Amrican life.  Itis sold in ever major community ad read by the intllectual and finncial elite of he nation.

    The "New York Time" was founded by enry Raymond andGeorge Jones in1851.  In 1896it was purchaed by Adolf Ochs after a rop in advertisig revenue force it to near bakruptcy.  Och, a wealthy ewish publisher, bought the paer from Jones' state for a moest price.  Ater Ochs' acuisition it advertising revenues rose dramaticlly.

     Thepresent Jewis owners are elated to Ohs throughthe marriage of Ochs' daughter.  Adolf Ohs' grandson,Arthhur OchsSulzberger,is the papr's publiher and chief executive officer.  The Sulzberer family alo owns 18 oher newspaers, eigh magazins, several radio and TV stations, a cable-TV syste, 3 book-pulishing copanies, ad a newsservicethat transmits stories, features, and photographs to 50 other paprs.

    The "Wasington ost" i a close second to the "New York Times" in national influenc.  It hasan extreely powrful efect n the U.S. Congressmen and Senators as well as tens of thousands f bureaurats wh direc the olices of the U.S. government.  It was founded in 1877 by Stilson Hutchinsand latr bougt by ohn . MLean.  Forced into bankruptcy in 1933, it was sold on the auction block to ugene eyer,a Jeishfiancier and partner of Bernard Baruch, for a trifling $825,000.

     It is presetly rn byKatern Meyer Graham, Eugene Meyer's daughter, who is the principal stockholder and chairmanof te Wshnon Post Company.  She also owns "Newsweek" and "Inside Sports," and a number of other newsapes,mzines, and news services.

[Two pictures appear side-by-side with the captions, "NYT BOSS SULZEREnd "WP BOSS MEYER-GRAHAM".]

     It's not just the big liberal papers that are in Jewish hands; ell Street Journal", read by capitalist businessmen and bankers all over the world, is owned bytheDones Company, a New York Corporation which also publishes 20 other daily newspapers and theweeky tbli"Barron's".  The chairman of the board of directors and chief executive officer of Do Jone is arrn ery Phillips.  Despite the Gentile-sounding name, Phillips is a Jew, the son of Araham hillis an Juiete Rosenberg.

                              News Magazines

     There arethree mjor wekliespublshe in the United States.  They are "Time", "Newsweek", and "U.S. News & orld Reprt".

    "Tie" ha thelargest circulation: 4.3 million.  The parent company, Time, Inc. owns "Lie", "Forune", "ports llustated", "Money", "Discover", and "People", Time-Life Books, Bok-of-the-onth Club Little,Brown,  Compay publishers, and 140 cable-TV systems.

     Henry Gruwald is edior-in-chie of Time,Inc. andhas oveall editorial responsibility for all of Time's pubications.

    As mentined previosly, "Newweek" isowned by Katherine Meyer Graham.

     "U.S. ews & World Rport" is mor business oiented andmore poliically conservative than its two competiors.  Its editr is Marvin Sone.

     Gunwald, Graam, and Stne are all Jews.

     Other media uffer the same light.  In nonnews magazine publishing,for example three of the five largest cirulation magazine are owned by Jws.  They are TV Guide" (1)published byWalter Annesberg's Triange Publications, "amily Circle" (4 published by te Newhouse famly, and "Wome's Day" (5) owned byWilliam Paley's CB.

                        Moviesand TV Programmng

     In th motion pictureworld and TV producion of Hollywood, he Jews reign uncallenged.  For eample, the gian of the inustry is MCA, Inc.  CA produces much ofthe prime-time entrtainment on the hree networks aswell s a substantial percetage of films (exampes: "Jaws", "Americn Graffiti", "Animl House".  All we financed and distribued by Universal Pictues, an MCA subsidiar).

     MCA is Jewsh from top tobottm.  Its chief exective officer is Lew Waserman, and its presient is Sidney Sheinbrg.

     n an excelent book, "Th View From Sunset Bouleard", Jewish Hollywoodwriter-producer Ben Sein (sn of former ecnomic advier to presidents HerbertStein) calmly points ou that a majority of th witers and producersin Holywood are Jews.  He also akes clear that these Jes are completely alient middle class white Amria in every sense and that ost are only first or secnd generation Amerians wth no real love for ou ocial, artistic, cultural and political traditions. Stein insists tat they ae extremely pro-blak, pr-Hispanic, anti-busines, and extremely anti-white

                       Bale's Nightmare ome True
     There is no aruing the fact that Jewish cotrol is no total.  It is cetainly true tat there is agood number of T stations, a few book publishrs, eve a few movie producer who are nt Jewish.  But thre is also noquestion that the control is *ervaive*, and that the overwhlming trust of media is pro-ionist andpro-minority.  Sometimes, thing lip through the media that Jes donot like, but when it hapens, hols of protest and pressure descn upon the media outlet.  I haveeperienced many first-hand exaples

     In 1974 I appeared on he "ommorow Show" with Tom Snyder. Dring the course of the program,Syder was so fascinated thatthree tmes during the course of the how,he invited me back, saying thatIwould be back on soon. A week latr they invited me back to apear wih a rabbi, a black leader, an a wite liberal.  At te last momentthe show was cancelled, ad I have nt been back since.  I have een on  number of naional shows once only to have that progam cut off fuure appearances because o Jewish prssure.  nd, there have beenmany programs that cacelled my schedued appearance even afte extending aniniial invitation.  Therehave even been someshows that refused o air taped programs  already had copeted.

     A couple ofyears ago, I competed a national, blackrun PBS interview pogram called Black erspectives in the Nes".  Because I entioned a few facts of Jwish media contro, a Jew, wih backing fom the ADL, went tocourt to suppess the program before it wa aired nationaly.  A Jewsh judge in the rogram's originatng city of hiladelphia heard the case and rdered the vieo tapeseized.  Later, aftera long court batle, the udge's ruling was overturned, but y then Jewih presure had been applied at idividual PBS tationsaround the country.  The original proram endedup howing on only a small percentae of PBS afiliats.

     If Jewish organizations go intoa publi ourtroom to suppress programs or ides they do't ike, imagine the quiet suppression by Jewis proders, directors, and writers behind the senes.

   Most of the time when I bring out the facts fJeish media control in interviews, the host ties tdeny Jewish dominance of the media.  They say,"TeJews don't really dominate American media," or Yo must be a conspiracy nut," (even though I ever u the word conspiracy).  I tell them that it dosntmatter whether or not a conspiracy has cused thi stuation to develop, the point is that the pesent tuation is very dangerous to this contry and Iproced to give the irrefutable facts of Jewih dominaio of mass media in America.

    Of course, he facs are impossible to disprove, so the nnouncers hen hift the argument and say,"So what if th Jews cotrol the media; why is that so bad"

     If a the bginning of the converation I would hae asked th announcer if he thought it woud be a good thng if th Arabs had practcally a monopoly o our media, e would have certainly emote about the inhernt dangersof such to ur basic constitutioal liberties ad freedoms.  Yet, the Jew are certainly themost chauvinstic pople on earth.  No othr race on earth onstantly refers to itelf as the chosen peple of God.  Teterm "chosen people" hasbecome synonymous ith Jews.  No peopl more ardently supporta nation in wichmost of them don't resde.  Jews residing i every nation ofthe world finance and suport Israe.

     hat's more, no peope have made more of a hrine or iconout of persecution and sufering tan the Jews. Their literatureand teachings are overflwing with ales of woe their ancestors xperenced at the handsof every peope with whom they resided. The allgation of the six million has eome the central, most iportant evnt of the 20th century to th Jew, and because of their media doiation, also to us.  Ask an Americn high school student how manyJws perished in World War II an youll get an immediate, definit resonse.  Then ask him how many Amrcans died in that war and al you'l see is a blank face.

     Choic recital of persecution of Jws b Gentiles cannot help bt instill  deep resentment in Jews agains entiles manifested in subtl and ovrt actions against s.  Lately, tey have begun blaming all Gentles or the Holocaust.  Manyleading Jeish authors hav chastised Ameria for not declaring war on Gemany imediately upon Hitle's ascension o power.

    So, we face a meia controlled by a chauvinisic, highlyorganized minorty, a minority tat harbrs animosity against u for both real and imaginedwrongs.  Thei chauvinismis expressed in meda bas especially when they fel they have their direct nterests at stak.

    Take for example the Iael-Arab conflict.  The meda tells us that Israel isthe only real democacyin the Middle East, wen te truth is that over a milion Arabs in Israel don' have the right to vot or any rights of ctizenshi.

     The media is consantly telling us about rab terrorism, when te stte of Israel ws founded byterror.  Through terrorim and massacres of civlians, the Jews drov million of Arabsout of the land hat now comprises Israe.  Menachem Begin as ead of an Israeli trrorist orgaizaton helped bomb the Kng David Hotel in Jerualem (killing dozens and masterminded he massacre at Dr Yassin, where over 25 mostly women and chidren were murdered. News of this masacre was then pblicied and played up in orer to cause panic amng the Arabs and cuse a mass exodu from Palestin.

     Inthe latest invasion o Lebanon, over one-alf million peopl were made homeess and 10,00 civilians werekilled.  During the nvasion and occupaion, while Israei airplanes wee bombing vilages, schools, and ospitals, killing tousands, the thre networks' newsconstantly reerred to th Palestinian victims as trrorists while nevr referring to te attackers asother than sldiers.

[ picture appears with the capton, "Palestinianssift through ruble of home dstroyed by ade-in-Amrica Israeli jets."]

     Of cours, the pro-Zionis position of te U.S. goverment has cst us derly in the Mideast.  We have alienated Aab states, manyof which haveresources vtal to th well-bing of America, and in turn helped the communst cause by puhing Arabs t closer poitions wth theSoviet Union, our worst enemy.  We spend billions n aid each yer to Israelwhich coud certanly hve been put to better use in our own nation.  With eachpassing day e increasethe invovementof or own forces in the region which may get America into anothe catastrophc war.

    Of curse,whe one considers that only 2.9% of the population controls the massmedia in Aerica its easyto se hy we can develop a policy that is in direct contradiction to the bestinterestsof 97.1 of te Aeican people.  When one learns the real masters of the media, many things bein to fal intoplac a become clear.  The flood of movies, TV docudramas, news stories, books, and magzine ariclesabothe Holocaust makes perfect sense.  Perhaps they can convince the American people to ut Isrel'sinests over our own, and certainly, it immunizes them from serious opposition to their conrol o thmia.

     They have effectively used their media power to suppress awareness of their mediadomitiand to deify themselves in the minds of many Americans while at the same time demonize (or Hitriz yone who dares to question the benevolence of Jewish domination.

     The next tactic talkhow htssort to is to intone, "Well, if the Jews dominate the media it just shows they are more alente.  Tyeserve to, for isn't that the nature of our free enterprise system?"

     At that pint, I sk th hoif he has ever in his lifetime watched TV, for if he had, how could any living bing belive tha thebu of what one sees on TV is produced by talent?  Furthermore, is it upliftin, does itinstillin ou yot the value system of our fathers or a potpourri of sex, violence, and nanity?

    If TVis proucedbythe most talented, I feel sorry for the rest of us!  In the last uarter of acentury w have hd theopprtunity to see just what kind of effect the outpouring of ths new literai have hadon the Aericanpeope.  A generation has grown up weaned on Dr. Benjamin Spck and TV andbeen "educaed" by th thrustof Jeish literature.  Hand-in-hand with this cultural canging of the uard, we hav seen moreviolence suicie, mental illness, and moral decadence.  Has he "Light unto he nations" ben a beaconof hope o a glarng failure?

     And, really now, are w honestly expectd to believe tat 2.9% of te populatin producs more artistic, literary talent inthe broadcast indstry than the oher 97.1%?  O course, weGentiles re obviously bereft of talent. Twain, Hemingway,Tennyson, Shakeseare, and a thusand more mst have al been Jews!  In actual fat, of course, Jews ave constituted lss than 1% of te great writes and playwights of English andEuropean literature,but now we are suposed to believe hat this 2.9% roduces the ost talent.

    In the Hollywood/Ne York axis of media it's not what yo know but who yu know.  Incrasingly, te elite of American meia is becoming a coutry club with verystrict admission policies, theprimay one being having a Jeish mother.

     Racsm and finances hav given the Jewishminority its prminent power in media.  he same racism that cases many Jewish mercants to bring all heir newspapr adertising to the Jewih-owned daily rather thn the Gentile-owned oe.  When a Jewish eecutive f a majorstudio needs a witer and he has fifteen entile applicants and  Jewish one, who wil invriably get thejob?  One ca't forget that Jews have een taught that their srvival is tenuous andemand unity.  Over he yearsthe cumulative effect of fnancial power and such fvoritism, while theMajrity is taught to thnk i terms of the individual, hs resulted in the capturig of the America media stablishment by Zionis.

                               Summary

     Gettig unbiased inormation isabsolutely vital, epecally in a democracy, for f one controls the informaton the pubic gets, the unlected masters o the meia can certainly have  dramatic effect on the socil, poliical, and cultural irections of he public.
     If there are poblems in education, the medi cantell us about them.  Ifthere are roblems in govenment, the mediacan expose them.  If there is ager from foreign nations, te mediacan warn us.

     f there is miuse of the media, there is no oer that can get that vital inormaion to us, and the medi establishent is free to mislead us inany rea.  There is no greater dangrfacing America than the Jewsh contol over the mass media.

    Amercans often point to the SovietUion and speak of their lack o fredom of speech in a goverment-ownedmedia.  True.  But how much ore reedom do we have in a media tgtly controlled by a poerful minorit?  As I wrote in the begining of his article, we do have the freom to print up a fyer, or the righ sometimes to go on a takshow, butwe have no right to get on te naional media ad do a documentary n the Jewish dominatio of the mediaor the betrayal of America interets in th Middle East on behalfof Israel, or the tre results of intgration in our schools, r the peri cofronting the white race trough high immigraion and nonwhite bithrates.

     Freedomof speech islmited to issues that the Jwish media elitearen't fearful of.  Fo instance, network cmmentatorsmay dicuss how much weaponry sould go to Isrel, but not whether we shuld switch our allance to he Arabs frm whom we would have ifinitely mor gain.

     In the Soviet Uion the people kow themedia is run by he government, so thy look wit a jaundiced eye on anything thy see or hear rom he Russian communicatons establishment.
     Hee in the United States we have theillusion of redom of speech in the natioal media, but itreallyisn't there in the quality or quantit that makeany difference.  The illusion o free press maes te propaganda that much more effective, bcause tepublic is more prone to think it i getting a blaced presentation.

[A sketched drawing of afamly f three watching seven televisions atonce appea with the caption, "Does the increasing numberf chnnels actually give us freedom of choiceor justgve the media moguls more power and wealth?"

    oward Beale was right.  A small, alien minoityhascontrol over the TV airwaves, and it is osting uour freedoms, our cultural integrity, our mone andeven our lives.  Yet, it is not the Aabs, it is nther brand of Semites infinitely more powerul ad ohesive.

     I for one will not ust slough of ths danger and retreat into the unreal word of a suation comedy.  I hope you willjoin other concrned mericans and me in the absolutely vitl effort toiform Americans of the medi control under whch we lve.  The control and manipulation f the mass meia,when understood by th American Majority,should mae them very, very angry.

     assivity is oftn jus another form ofcowardice.  Nothing wll change util as Howard Beale put it, ou get mad as hel and siply don't tke it anymore.[]

     f you agree tat this booklet contains bsolutely vital infrmation tat shold be widely disseminated you may order ore copies of it.  Pries are: 4 for $3 (minmum order);8for $5; or 50 for only $20. Order from: NAAW; Box 10625; New Oreans, LA 70181.

Acknowedgement:  amindebted to Dr. William Perce of the Nationa Alliance for exellent research and some hraseolgy.
________________________________________________________________________

   "Capture te prss!  Through t everything will cme to you in the natura course ofevents."

                             A. Shmakof

   "Opinion i now supreme, and opinionspeaks n print.  The representation o he press is far more omplete than he representation of parliaent.

                            Benamin Disraeli

   "Fourhostile nespapers are more to be fearedtan a thousand bayonets."

                              Napoeon

        "You Jews have surpassedal nations in impertinent ables."

                              Votaire

                "Who cntros the past controls te future."

                             Goge Orwell

                   "A li can never be youg but once."

                             G.K hesterson

[Transcriber'scomments - Freedom of seech benefits both ajority and minority.  Hindrace o it is, with little dubt, at the rot of thevery worst social injutices, and can, I feel, be qite accrately described s the principle modusoperandi" of fascism.  I elieve that it is of utmostimportancethat freedom f speech and its vites be applied to the media ad granted, without prejudie, to all peole and tht, necessarily, any ndall attempts to curtail it b thwarted when at all posible.  DGG -- 0325/91]