#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@
  $%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#%$&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#
  %&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$
  &@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%
  @#$%&                                                                 @#$%&
  #$%&@                The New Tesla Electromagnetics and               #$%&@
  $%&@#               The Secrets of Free Electrical Energy             $%&@#
  %&@#$                                                                 %&@#$
  &@#$%                   (Part 1)  by T. E. Bearden                    &@#$%
  @#$%&                                                                 @#$%&
  #$%&@   Retyped Without Permission, 7/13/86, by (_>Shadow Hawk 1<_)   #$%&@
  $%&@#                                                                 $%&@#
  %&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$
  &@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%
  @#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&
  #$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@





                Comments on the New Tesla Electromagnetics
                  ------------------------------------------
                    A:Discrepancies in Present EM Theory

  There are at least twenty-two major discrepancies presently existing
in conventional electromagnetics theory. This paper presends a summary
of those flaws, and is a further commentary on my discussion of scalar
longitudinal waves in a previous paper, "Solutions to Tesla's Secrets
and the Soviet Tesla Weapons," Tesla Book Company, 1981 and 1982.

  I particularly wish to express my deep appreciation to two of my
friends and colleagues who at this time, I believe, wish to remain
anonymous. One of the two is an experimental genius who  can produce
items that do not work by ortho- dox theory. The second is a master of
materials science and electromagnetics theory. I thank them both for
their exceptional contributions and stimuli regarding potential
shortcoming in present electromagnetics theory, and their forbearance
with the many discussions we have held on this and related subjects.

  It goes without saying that any etrors in this paper are strictly my
own, and not the fault of either of my distinguished colleagues.



  (1) In present electromagnetics theory, charge and charged mass are
falsely made identical. Actually, on a charged particle, the "charge" is
the flux of virtual particles on the "bare particle" of observable mass.
The charged part- icle is thus a "system" of true massless charge
coupled to a bare chargeless mass. The observable "mass" is static,
three-dimensional and totally spatial. "Charge" is dynamic,
four-dimensional or more, virtual and spatiotemporal. Further, the
charge and observable mass can be de-coupled, contrary to present
theory. Decoupled charge -- that is, the absence of mass -- is simply
what we presently refer to as "Vacuum." Vacuum, spacetime, and massless
charge are all identical. Rigorously, we should utilize any of these
three as an "ether," as suggested for vacuum by Einstein himself (see
Max Born, Einstiein's Theory of Relativity, Revised Edition, Dover
Publications, New York, 1965, p. 224). And all three of them are
identically anenergy -- not energy, but more fundamental components of
energy.

  (2) Electrostatic potential is regarded as a purely 3-dimensional
spatial stress. Instead, it is the intensity of a many-dimensional (at
least four- dimensional) virtual flux and a stress on all four
dimensions of spacetime. This is easily seen, once one recognizes that
spacetime is identically masless charged. (It is not "filled" with
charge; rather, it is charge!) Just as, in a gas under pressure, the
accumulation of additional gas further stresses the gas, the
accumulation of charge (spacetime) stresses charge (spacetime). Further,
if freed from its attachment to mass, charge can flow exclusively in
time, exclusively in space, or in any combination of the two. Tesla
waves -- which are scalar waves in pure massless charge flux itself --
thus can exhibit extraordinary characteristics that ordinary vector
waves do not possess. And Tesla waves have extra dimensional degrees of
freedom in which to move, as compared to vector waves. Indeed, one way
to visualize a tesla scalar wave is to regard it as a pure oscillation
of time itself.

  (3) Voltage and potential are often confused in the electrostatic
case, or at least thought of as "composed of the same thing." For that
reason, voltage is regarded as "potential drop." This also is not true.
Rigorously, the potential is the intensity of the virtual particle flux
at a single point -- whether or not there is any mass at the point --
and both the pressure and the point itself are spatiotemporal
(4-dimensional) and not spatial (3-dimensional) as presently  assumed.
Voltage  represents  the  spatial  intersection  of  the difference in
potential between  two seperated spatial  points, and always implies at
least a miniscule flow of mass current (that is what makes it spatial!).
"Voltage" is spatial and depends upon the presence of observable mass
flow, while scalar electrostatic potential is spatiotemporal and depends
upon the absence of observable mass flow. The two are not even of the
same dimensionality.

  (4) The charge of vacuum spacetime is assumed to be zero, when in fact
it is a very high value. Vacuum has no mass, but it has great massless
charge and virtual particle charge flux. For proof that a charged vacuum
is the seat of something in motion, see G. M. Graham and D. G. Lahoz,
"Observation of static electromagnetic angular momentum in vacuo,"
Nature, Vol. 285, 15 May 1980, pp. 154-155. In fact, vacuum IS charge,
identically, and it is also spacetime, and at least four-dimensional.

  (5) Contrary to its present usage, zero is dimensional and relative in
its context. A three-dimensional spatial hole, for example, exists in
time. If we model time as a dimension, then the spatial hole has one
dimension in 4-space. So a spatial absence is a spatiotemporal presence.
In the vacuum 4-space, a spatial nothing is still a something. The
"virtual" concept and mathematical concept of a derivative are simply
two present ways of unconsciously addressing this fundamental problem of
the dimensional relativity of zero.

  (6) The concepts of "space" and "time" imply that spacetime (vacuum)
has been seperated into two parts. We can only think of a space as
"continuing to exist in time."  To separate  vacuum spacetime  into two
pieces,  an operation  is continually required. The operator that
accomplishes this splitting operation is the photon interaction, the
interaction of vector electromagnetic energy or waves with mass. I have
already strongly pointed out this effect and presented a "raindrop
model" or first-order physical change itself in my book, The Excalibur
Briefing, Strawberry Hill Press,  San Francisco, 1980, pp. 128-130.

  (7) "Vector magnetic potential" is assumed to be always an aspect of
(and connected to) the magnetic field. In fact it is a separate,
fundamental field of nature and it can be entirely disconnected from the
magnetic field. See Richard P. Feynman et al, The Feynman Lectures on
Physics, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, 1964, Vol. II, pp.
15-8 to 15-14. Curiously, this fact has been proven for years, yet it
has been almost completely ignored in the West. The "(triangle)x"
operator, when applied to the A-field, makes B-field. If the (triangle)x
operator is not applied, the "freed" A-field possesses much-expanded
characteristics from those presently allowed in the "bound" theory.
Specifically, it becomes a scalar or "shadow vector" field; it is not a
normal vector field.

  (8) The speed of light in vacuum is assumed to be a fundamental
constant of nature. Instead it is a function of the intensity of the
massless charge flux (that is, of the magnitude of the electrostatic
potential) of the vacuum in which it moves. (Indeed, since vacuum and
masless charge are one and the same, one may say that the speed of light
is a function of the intensity of the spatiotemporal vacuum!). The
higher the flux intensity (charge) of the vacuum, the faster the speed
of light in it. This is an observed fact and already shown by hardcore
measurements. For example, distinct differences actually exist in the
speed of light in vacuo, when measured on the surface of the earth as
compared to measurements in space away from planetary masses. In a
vacuum on the surface of the earth, light moves significantly faster.
For a discussion and the statistics, see B. N. Belyaev, "On Random
Fluctuations of the Velocity of Light in Vacuum," Soviet Physics
Journal, No. 11, Nov. 1980, pp. 37-42 (original in Russian, translation
by Plenum Publishing Corporation.) The Russians have used this knowledge
for over two decades in their strategic psychotronics (energetics)
program; yet hardly a single U.S. scientist is aware of the measured
variation of c in vacuo. In fact, most Western scientists simply cannot
believe it when it is pointed out to them!

  (9) Energy is considered fundamental and equivalent to work. In fact,
energy arises from vector processes, and it can be disassembled into
more fundamental (anenergy) scalar components, since the vectors can.
These scalar components individually can be moved to a distant location
without expending work, since one is not moving force vectors. There the
scalar components can be joined and reassembled into vectors to provide
"free energy" appearing at a distance, with no loss in between the
initial and distant points. For proof that a vector field can be
replaced by (and considered to be composed of) two scalar fields, see E.
T. Whittaker, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, Volume 1,
1903, p. 367. By extension, any vector wave can be replaced by two
coupled scalar waves.

  (10) The classical Poynting vector predicts no longitudinal wave of
energy from a time-varying, electrically charged source. In fact, an
exact solution of the problem does allow this longitudinal wave. See T.
D. Keech and J. F. Corum, "A New Derivation for the Field of a
Time-Varying Charge in Einsteins Theory," International Journal of
Theoretical Physics, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1981, pp. 63-68 for the proof.

  (11) The present concepts of vector and scalar are severely limited,
and do not permit the explicit consideration of the internal,
finer-grained structures of a  vector or  a scalar.  That is, a
fundamental problem  exists with  the basic assumptions in the vector
mathematics itself. The "space" of a vector field, for example, does not
have inter-nested sublevels (subspaces) containing finer "shadow
vectors" or "virtual vectors." Yet particle physics has already
discovered that electrical reality is built that way. Thus one should
actually use a "hypernumber" theory after the manner of Charles Muses. A
scalar is filled with (and composed of) nested levels of other "spaces"
containing vectors, where these sum to "zero" in the ordinary observable
frame without an observable vector resultant. In Muses' mathematics, for
example, zero has real roots. Real physical devices can be -- and have
been -- constructed in accordance with Muses' theory. For an
introduction to Muses' profound hypernumberss approach, see Charles
Muses' forward to Jerome Rothstein, Communication, Ogranization and
Science, The Falcon's Wing Press, Indian Hills, Colorado, 1958. See also
Charles Muses', "Applied Hypernumbers: Computational Convepts," Applied
Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 3, 1976. See also Charles Muses'
"Hypernumbers II", Aoplied Mathematics and Computation, Janurary 1978.

  (12) With the expanded Tesla electromagnetics, a new conservation of
energy law is required. Let us recapitulate for a moment. The oldest law
called for the conservation of mass. The present law calls for the
conservation of "mass and energy", but not each separately. If mass is
regarded as simply another aspect of energy, then the present law calls
for the conservation of energy. However, this assumes that energy is a
basic, fundamental concept. Since the energy concept is tied to work and
the movement of vector forces, it implicitly assumes "vector movement2
to be a "most fundamental" and irreducible concept. But as we pointed
out, Whittaker showed that vectors can always be further broken down
into more fundamental coupled scalar components. Further, Tesla
discovered that these "coupled components" of "energy" can be
individually separated, transmitted, processed, rejoined, etc. This
directly implies that energy per se need not be conserved. The new law
therefore calls for the conservation of anenergy, the components of
energy. These components may be coupled into energy, and the energy may
be further compacted into mass. It is the sum total of the (anenergy)
components -- coupled and uncoupled -- that is conserved, not the matter
or the energy per se. Further, this conservation of anenergy is not
spatial; rather it is spatiotemporal in a spacetime of at least four or
more dimensions.

  (13) Relativity is presently regarded as a theory or statement about
fundamental physical reality. In fact, it is only a statement about
FIRST ORDER reality  --  the  reality  that  emerges  from  the  vector
interaction  of electromagnetic energy with matter. When we break down
the vectors into scalars (shadow vectors or hypervectors), we immediatly
enter a vastly different, far more fundamental reality. In this reality
superluminal velocity, multiple universes, travel back and forth in
time, higher dimensions, variation of all "fundamental constants" of
nature, materialization and dematerialization, and violation of the
"conservation of energy" are all involved. Even our present Aristotlean
logic -- fitted to the photon interaction by vector light as the
fundamental observation mechanism -- is incapable of describing or
modeling this more fundamental reality. Using scalar waves and scalar
interactions as much subtler, far less limited observation/detection
mechanisms, we must have a new "superrelativity" to describe the
expanded electromagnetic reality uncovered by Nikola Tesla.

  (14) "Charge" is assumed to be quantized, in addition to always
occuring with -- and locked to -- mass. Indeed, charge is not
necessarily quantized, just as it is not necessarily locked to mass.
Ehrenhaft discovered and reported fractional charges for years, in the
30's and 40's, and was ignored. See P.A.M. Dirac, "Development of the
Physicist's Conception of Nature", Sumposium on the Development of the
Physicist's Conception of Nature, ed. Jagdish Merha, D. Reidel, Boston,
1973, pp. 12-14 for a presentation of some of Ehrenhaft's results.
Within the last few years Stanford University researchers have also
positively demonstrated the existence of "fractional charge." For a
layman's description of their work, see "A Spector Haunting Physics,"
Science News, Vol. 119, January 31, 1981, pp. 68-69. Indeed, Dirac in
his referenced article points out that Millikan himself -- in his
original oildrop experiments -- reported one measurement of fractional
charge, but discounted it as probably due to error.

  (15) Presently, things are always regarded as traveling through normal
space. Thus we use or model only the most elementary type of motion --
that performed by vector electromagnetic energy. We do not allow for
things to "travel inside the vector flow itself." Yet, actually, there
is a second, more subtle flow inside the first, and a third, even more
subtle flow inside the second, and so on. We may operate inside, onto,
into, and out of energy itself -- and any anenergy component of energy.
There are hypervectors and hyperscalars unlimited , within the ordinary
vectors and scalars we already know. Further, these "interlan flows" can
be engineered and utilized, allowing physical reality itself to be
directly engineered, almost without limits.

  (16) We always assume everything exists in time. Actually, nothing
presently measured exists in time, because the physicical
detection/measurement process of our present instruments destroys time,
ripping it off and tossing it away -- and thereby "collapsing the wave
function." Present scientific methodology thus is seriously flawed. It
does not yield fundamental (spacetime) truth, but only a partial
(spatial) truth. This in turn leads to great scientific oversights. For
example. mass does not exist in time, but mass x time (masstime) does. A
fundamental constant does not exist in time, but "constant x time" does.
Energy does not exist in time, but energy x time (action) does. Even
space itself does not exist in time -- spacetime does. We are almost
always one dimension short in every observable we model. Yet we persist
in thinking spatially, and we have developed instruments that detect and
measure spatially only. Such instruments can never measure and detect
the phenomenology of the nested substrata of time. By using scalar
technology, however, less limited instruments can indeed be constructed
-- and they have been. With such new instruments, the phenomenology of
the new electromagnetics can be explored and an engineering technology
developed.

  (17) We do not recognize the connection between nested levels of
virtual state (particle physics) and orthogonally rotated frames
(hyperspaces). Actually, the two are identical, as I showed in the
appendix to my book, The Excalibur Briefing, Strawberry Hills Press, San
Francisco, 1980, pp. 233-235. A virtual particle in the laborotory frame
is an observable particle in a hyperspatial frame rotated more than one
orthogonal turn away. This of course implies that the hyperspatial
velocity of all virtual particles is greater than the speed of light.
The particle physicist is already deeply involved in hyperspaces and
hyperspatial charge fluxes without realizing it. In other words , he is
using tachyons (particles that move faster than light) without realizing
it.

  (18) Presently quantum mechanics rigorously states that time is not an
observable, and therefore it cannot be measured or detected. According
to this assumption, one must always infer time from spatial
measurements, because all detections and measurements are spatial. With
this assumption, our scientists prejudice themselves against looking for
finer, subquantal measurement methodologies and instrumentation.
Actually this present limitation is the result of the type of
electromagnetics we presently know, where all instruments (the
"measurers") have been interacted with by vector electromagnetic energy
(light). Every mass that has temperature (and all masses do!) is
continually absorbing and emitting photons, and in the process they are
continually connecting to time and disconnecting from time. If time is
continually being carried away from the detector itself by its emitted
photons, then the detector cannot  hold  and  "detect"  that  which  it
has  just  lost.  With  Tesla electromagnetics, however, the fundamental
limitation of our present instru- ments need not apply. With finer
instruments, we can show there are an infinite number of levels to
"time", and it is only the "quantum level time" which is continually
being lost by vector light (photon) interaction. By using subquantal
scalar waves, instruments can move to deeper levels of time -- in which
case the upper levels of time ARE measureable and detectable, in
contradistinction to present assumptions.

  (19) In the present physics, time is modeled as, and considered to be,
a continuous dimension such as length. This is only a gross
approximation. Indeed , time is not like a continuous "dimension," but
more like a series of "stiches," each of which is individually made and
then ripped out before the next stitch appears. "Vector light" photons
interact one at a time, and it is this interaction with mass that
creates quantum change itself. The absorbtion of a photon -- which is
energy x time -- by a spatial mass converts it to masstime: the time was
added by the photon. The emission of a photon tears away the time,
leaving behind again a spatial mass. It is not accidental, then, that
time flows at the speed of light, for it is light which contains and
carries time. It is also not accidental that the photon IS the
individual quantum. Since all our instruments presently are continually
absorbing and emitting photons, they are all "quantized," and they
accordingly "quantize" their detections. This is true because all
detection is totally internal to the detector, and the instruments only
detect only their own internal changes. Since these detections are on a
totally granular quantized background, the detections themselves are
quantized. The Minkowski model is fundamentally erroneous in its
modeling of time, and for that reason relativity and quantum mechanics
continue to resist all attempts to successfully combine them, quantum
field theory notwithstanding.

  (20) Presently, gravitational field and electrical field are
considered mutually exclusive. Actually this is also untrue. In 1974,
for example, Santilli proved that electrical field and gravitational
fiend indeed are not mutually exclusive. In that case one is left with
two possibilities: (a) they are totally the same thing, or (b) they are
partially the same thing. For the proof, see R. M. Santilli, "Partons
and Gravitation: Some Puzzling Questions," Annals of Physics, Vol. 83,
No. 1, March 1974. With the new Tesla electromagnetics, pure scalar
waves in time itself can be produced electrically , and electrostatics
(when the charge has been seperated from the mass) becomes a "magic"
tool capable of directly affecting anything that exists in time --
including the gravitational field. Antigravity and the intertial drive
are immediate and direct consequences of the new electromagnetics.

  (21) Presently, mind is considered metaphysical, not a part of
physics, and not affected by physical means. Literally, the prevailing
belief of Western scientists is that man is a mechanical robot -- even
though relativity depends entirely upon the idea of the idea of the
"observer." Western science today thus has essentially become dogmatic,
and in this respect borders on a religion. Since this "religion," so to
speak, is now fairly well entrenched in its power in the state, Western
science is turning itself into an oligarchy. But mind occupies time, and
when we measure and affect time, we can directly measure and affect mind
itself. In the new electromagnetics, then, Man regains his dignity and
his humanity by restoring the reality of mind and thought to science. In
my book, The Excalibur Briefing, I have already pointed out the reality
of mind and a simplified way in which it can be modeled to the first
order. With scalar wave instruments, the reality of mind and thought can
be measured in the laboratory, and parapsychology becomes a working,
engineering, scientific discipline.

  (22) Multiple valued basic dimensional functions are either not
permitted or severely discouraged in the present theory. For one thing,
integrals of multiple valued derivative functions have the annoying
habit of "blowing up" and yielding erroneous answers, or none at all.
And we certainly do not allow multiple types of time! This leads to the
absurdity of the present interpretation of relativity, which permits
only a single observer (and a single observation) at a time. So if one
believes as "absurd" a thing as the fact that more than one person can
observe an apple at the same time, the present physics fails. However,
the acceptance of such a simple proposition as multiple simultaneous
observation leads to a physics so bizarre and incredible that most
Western physicists have been unable to tolerate it, much less examine
its consequences. In the physics that emerges from multiple simultaneous
observation, all possibilities are real and physical. There are an
infinite number of worlds, orthogonal to one another, and each world is
continually splitting into additional such "worlds" at a stupendous
rate. Nonetheless, this physics was worked out by Everett for his
doctoral thesis in 1956, and the thesis was published in 1957. (See Hugh
Everett, III, The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: A
Fundamental Exposition, with papers by J. A. Wheeler, B. S. DeWitt, L.
N. Cooper and D. Van Vechten, and N. Graham; eds. Bryce S. Dewitt and
Neill Graham, Princeton Series in Physics, Princeton University Press,
1973.) Even though it is bizarre, Everett's physics is entirely
consistent with the present experimental basis of physics. The present
electromagnetic theory is constructed for only a single "rodl" or
universe -- or "level." The expanded theory, on the other hand, contains
multiply nested levels of virtual state charge -- and these levels are
identically the same as orthogonal universes, or "hyperframes." Multiple
kinds -- and values -- of time also exist. The new concept differs from
Everett's, however, in that the orthogonal universes intercommunicate in
the virtual state. That is, an observable in one universe is always a
virtual quantity in each of the other universes. Thus one can have
multi-level "continuities" and "discontinuities" simultaneously, without
logical conflict. It is precisely these levels of charge -- these levels
of scalar vacuum -- that lace together the discontinuous quanta
generated by the interaction of vector light with mass.

  However, to understand the new electromagnetic reality, one requires a
new, expanded logic which contains the old Aristotlean logic as a
subset. I have already pointed out the new logic in my paper, "A
Conditional Criterion for Identity, Leading to a Fourth Law of Logic,"
1979, available from the National Technical Information Center,
AD-A071032.

  Even as logic is extended, quantum mechanics, quantum electrodynamics,
and relativity are drastically changed by the Tesla electromagnetics, as
I point- ed out in my paper, "Solutions to Tesla's Secrets and the
Soviet Tesla Weapons," Tesla Book Company, 1580 Magnolia, Millbrae, CA,
94030, 1980.

  The  present  electromagnetics  is  just  a  special  case  of  a
much  more fundamental electromagnetics discovered by Nikola Tesla, just
as Newtonian physics is a special case of the relativistic physics. But
in the new electromagnetics case, the differences between the old and
the new are far more drastic and profound.

                          Additional References
                          ---------- ----------

1. Boren, Dr. Lawence Milton, "Discovery of the Fundamental Magnetic
Charge (Arising from the new Conservation of Magnetic Energy),"
1981/1982 (private communication). Dr. Boren has a cogent argument that
the positron is the fundamental unit of magnetic charge. His theory thus
assigns fundamentally different natures to positive charge and negative
charge. In support of Dr. Boren, one should point out that the
"positive" end of circuits can simply be "less negative" than the
"negative" end. In other words, the circuit works simply from higher
accumulation of negative charges (the "negative" end) to a lesser
accumulation of negative charges (the "positive" end). Nowhere needthere
be positive charges (protons, positrons, etc.) to make the circuit work.
Dr. Borens theory, though dramatic at first encounter, nonetheless bears
close and meticulous examination -- particularly since he has been able
to gather experimental data which support his theory and disagree with
present theory.

2. Eagle, Albert, "An Alternative Explanation of Relativity Phenomena,"
philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, No. 191, December 1939,
pp. 694 -701.

3. Ehrenaft, Felix and Wasser, Emanuel, "Determination of the Size and
Weight of Single Submicroscopic Spheres of the Order of Magnitude r = 4
x 10(-5) cm. to 5 x 10(-6) cm., as well as the Production of Real Images
of Submicroscopic Particles by means of Ultraviolet Light," Phil. Mag.
and Jour. of Sci., Vol. II (Seventh Series), No. 7, July 1926, pp.
30-51.

4. Ehrenhaft, Felix and Wasser, Emanuel, "New Evidence of the Existance
of Charges smaller than the Electron - (a) The Micromagnet; (b) The Law
of Resistance; (c) The computation of errors of the Method," Phil. Mag.
and Jour. of Sci., Vol. V (Seventh Series), No. 28, February 1928, pp.
225-241.

5. See also Ehrenhaft's last paper dealing with the electronic charge,
in Philosophy of Science, Vol. 8, 1941, p. 403.

6. McGregor, Donald Rait, The Inertia of the Vacuum: A New Foundation
for Theoretical Physics, Exposition Press, Smithtown, NY, First Edition,
1981, pp. 15-20.

7. Ignat'ev, Yu. G. and Balakin, A. B., "Nonliner Gravitational Waves in
Plasma," Soviet Physics Journal, Vol. 24, No. 7, July 1981, (U.S.
Translation, Consultants Bureau, NY, JAnurary 1982), pp. 593-597.

8. Yater, Joseph C., "Relation of the second law of thermodynamics to
the power conversion of energy fluctuations," Phys. Review A, Vol. 20,
no. 4, October 1979, pp. 1614-1618.

9. DeSantis, Romano M. et al, "On the Analysis of Feedback Systems With
a Multipower Open Loop Chain," October 1973, available through the
Defense Technical Information Center (AD 773188).

10. Graneau, Peter, "Electromagnetic Jet-Propulsion in the Direction of
current flow," Nature, Vol. 295, 28 Janurary 1982, pp. 311-312

11. "Gravity and acceleration aren't always equivalent," New Scientist,
17 September 1981, p. 723.

12. Gonyaev, V. V., "Experimental Determination of the Free-Fall
Acceleration of a Relativistic Charged Particle. II. A Cylindrical
Solenoid in a Time- Independent Field of Inertial Forces," Izvestiya
VUZ, Fizika, No. 7, 1979, pp. 28-32. English Translation: Soviet Physics
Journal, No. 7, 1979, pp. 829-833. If one understands the new, expanded
electromagnetics, this Soviet paper indicates a means of generating
antigravity and pure inertial fields.

13. R. Schaffranke, "The Development of Post-Relativistic Concepts in
Physics and Advanced Technology Abroad," Energy Unlimited, No. 12,
Winter 1981, pp. 15-20.

14. F. K. Preikschat, A Critical look at the theory of Relativity,
Library of Congress Catalogue No. 77-670044. Extensive compilation of
measurements of the speed of light. Clearly shows the speed of light is
not constant but changes, sometimes even daily.


           B: The Secret of Electrical Free Energy

Present electromagnetic theory is only a special case of the much more
funda- mental electromagnetic theory discovered by Nikola Tesla at the
turn of the century.

Pure vacuum is pure charge flux, without mass. The vacuum has a very
high electrical potential -- something on the order of 200 million
volts, with respect to a hypothetical zero charge.

Thus in an ordinary electrical circuit, each point of the "ground" --
which has the same potential as the vacuum -- actually has a non-zero
absolute potential. This circuit ground has a value of zero only with
respect to something else which has the same absolute electrical
potential.

Voltage, which is always associated with a flow of electrical "mass"
current (even if only a miniscule flow), is, by definition, a difference
dropped in potential when a charge mass moves between two spatially
seperated points. What we have termed "electrical current" only flows
where there is a suitable conducting medium between things which have a
difference in absolute potential. Furthermore, between any two points in
any material, there is considered to be a finite resistance -- if we
apply a voltage ahd have a mass current flowing between the two points!
Rigorously, to have one of the three is to have them all. To lose one is
to lose all three. Immediately we see a major error in present theory:
One can have a "difference in scalar potential" between two points
without having a "voltage drop" between them. Specifically, if no mass
current flows between them, no resistance exists between them, and no
voltage drop exists between them.

In the same fashion, one can have a "scalar wave" through the vacuum without
a voltage wave. In that case, the wave has no E-field and no H-field. The only
reason one has an E field around a statically charged object is because the
charged electrons accumulated on the object are actually in violent motion. It
is this motion of the charged masses that produces E-field -- as well as H-field
whenever that entire E-field ensemble moves through laborotory space.

Now let us reason together the "approximate" manner utilized in present
electromagnetic theory. For example, let us examine a bird sitting on a
high tension line.

The bird sits on the high tension line without a flow of mass
electricity, because there is no significant difference in potential
drop between the bird and the line. Specifically, between the birds two
feet -- each in contact with a different portion of the line -- there
exists no potential difference. This is true even though, with respect
to the vacuum, each foot is at a potential that would be "100,000 volts
higher," were a mass current flowing. And it is true even though the
absolute potential of each foot may be some 200.1 million "volts," were
a mass current flowing.

Now an interesting thing happens to the bird when he flies through the
air to light upon the high tension wire. As he flies towards the wire,
he is flying through the massless electrostatic potential field of the
wire, for that field extends an infinite distance away from the wire.
The electrostatic potential field -- pure 0-field -- is actually the
spatiotemporal intensity of the massless charge at a point. In other
words, as the bird flies to the wire, he flies into an increasing
"massless charge" potential, building up to 100,000 "volts" higher than
the earth. However, very little (if any) "mass flow" potential
difference is experienced upon his body in approaching the wire, and so
essientially no "charged mass currents" are induced in his body. Thus
the little flier safely navigates into the teeth of a very high
electrostatic potential, lights upon the wire, and is not "fried" in the
process. When he lights on the wire, his body has reached the
electrostatic potential that each foot's contact point has. Again, there
is no mass current flow. But his body is immersed in an increased flux
of massless charge -- which is what the electrostatic potential
represents. And each "virtual particle" flow in that charge represents a
"massless (scalar)" electrical current.

The point is, one can have any amount of massless charge flow --
"scalar" current -- without any mechanical work being done in the
system. All electrical work in a circuit is done against the physical
mass of the charged masses that flow. Rigorously, force is defined as
the time rate of charge of momentum. Even in the relativistic case where
F = ma + v(dm/dt), change of momentum requires mass movement. No
mechanical work, and hence no energy, is expended by massless charge
flow.

That is why the vacuum massless charge -- which is composed of a very
high flux of massless "particles" -- normally does no work on our
systems, and expends none of its very high "potential energy." It is
exactly the same as the bird which flew into an increasing scalar field
as it approached the high tension wire -- no work was done upon the bird
by the increasing scalar flux currents encountered by its body.

By existing "in the vacuum," so to speak, we (the whole earth) are as
birds sitting on a high tension line! Until we create a significant
differece in potential, via our present electromagnetic circuits, no
current can flow -- anywhere. Even if we produce potential differences,
we must have a conductor and charged masses to flow, if we with to
produce mechanical work. Presently our electromagnetic theory allows us
to create a difference in potential within different parts of a circuit,
but only by moving and shifting charged mass. We therefore have to do
work on this electrical mass in moving it around, and we only get back
the work we have put into the circuit. In other words, presently all wee
do is "pump" electrical mass.

Now notice what would happen to the bird on the line if we substantially
"pulsed" the potential on the line. Suppose we "pulsed" it such that the
bird's physical system -- considered as  a circuit containing a
capicitance, a resistance, an inductance, and many free electrons --
became resonant to the pulsing frequency. In that case the "bird system"
would resonate, and a great deal of electrical mass would surge back and
forth in the body of the bird. In the birds body, voltage would exist,
charged mass current would flow, work would be done, and the bird would
be electrocuted.

Also, note that, without mass movement, electromagnetic vector fields
are not produced (and a portion of the difficulty lies with the actual
vector mechanics itself). Scalar (nonvector) waves continually penetrate
the "space" where there is no mass movement. This means there can exist
a "delta-0" without a voltage or an E-field. The present theory does not
allow this, because it always uses "q" (charge) to be charged mass.
Briefly, without belaboring the point, let us just say that is the
mechanical spin of the individual charged particle -- such as the
electron -- which "entangles" or "knits together" or "couples"
independent scalar waves into vector waves. A vector wave is simply two
coupled scalar waves. The entire force field concept -- such as the
E-field and the B-field -- is operationally Defined in terms of the
force exhibited on a test particle, or test mass. Rigorusly, an E-field
does not exist as a force field in a vacuum, but as two coupled scalar
0-fields "tumbling about each other." When these two coupled, tumbling
fields meet a spinning electron, e.g., the force emerges on the electron
mass. In short, movement of a rotating mass changes delta-0 to
"voltage", creating the V/I/R triad.

By "accululating charged mass particles" -- such as electrons -- one
certainly can increase the value of 0, which represents the charge
intensity or "scalar electrostatic potential." However, that is not the
only way to increase it. Resonance and rotation of charged mass can also
be appropriately employed to vary the vacuum charge potential 0, under
proper circumstances.

By the correct application of rotary principles and Tesla
electromagnetic theory, it is possible to oscillate -- and change the
vacuum potential itself, in one part of an electrical system. Thus by
correct procedures a part of a system can be electrically altered so
that the absolute value of its "ground" (vacuum) potential differs
significantly from the normal vacuum-ground potential of the remainder
of the circuit. In other words, we shift the vacuum-ground potential of
the part of the circuit by oscillating the massless vacuum charge
itself, and in doing so we gain a substantial, oscillatory electrical
difference between that part of the circuit and the normal ground
potential of the rest of the system.  Then we connect the two parts of
the system by means of a conductor containing a load in the middle.

In every conductor, a large number of "free electrons" are available. If
we oscillate the actual vacuum charge itself, unlimited additional free
electrons also become availabe from the Dirac Sea, since partial
"unstripping" of the negative energy wells (each containing an electron)
occurs. This "unstripping" of the potential of the well is due to vacuum
potential oscil- lation, which oscillates time as well as space. To a
negative energy well ( positive time), the oscillation of its "time
stream" increases the well's negative potential during one half-cycle
and decreases its potential for the other half-cycle. Thus during half
the oscillatory cycle, negative energy electrons may be lifted from the
Dirac Sea if the oscillation is sufficiently intense.

Therefore we obtain an attendant voltage and flow of mass current
through the load. This voltage and current, by the way, are essentially
limitless, and are free for the asking, assuming the proper "vacuum
oscillation" is initiated and maintained so that electrons are
continually being lifted from the Dirac sea by the time oscillations,
and fed into the circuit.

Standard electromagnetic theory assumes that the vacuum potential is
zero. It does not recognize the existence of massless charge, separated
from charged mass. Therefore, orthodox scientists have never looked for
a way to engineer the vacuum, because they have not realized it is
composed of pure massless charge. Electrical physics has almost
hopelessly confused charge and charged mass, thereby eliminating scalar
longitudinal electrostatic waves. Expressed in the bird/high tension
line analogy, the present electromagnetic theory restricts us to walking
along the high tension line, laboriously carrying small batteries and
power units, unaware of the limitless, surging power beneath our very
feet.

Electromagnetically, we have been rather like one of the five blind men
who touched an elephant. We have only touched one small portion of the
electromagnetism "elephant," yet we thought we had grasped the entire
beast.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Use this information in any way that you wish; I take no responsibility for
the results of your actions. This file was presented for "informational use"
only.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------