Physical FORCE: What It REALLY IS

               Most orthodox physicists do NOT know what a force REALLY 
          IS.  The best that they can do is to define it in terms of 
          what it DOES--accelerate a mass, (F = ma).  Yet, they 
          ARROGANTLY use the terms "PSEUDO-FORCE" and "FICTIONAL FORCE" 
          to describe forces like centrifugal force and the Coriolis 
          force.  The physicists have FAILED to pick up the CLUE, about 
          what a force really is, from the fact that these so-called 
          "pseudo-forces" result from MOTIONS. 

               According to the GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the physical 
          universe developed by the late Physicist Dewey B. Larson, a 
          force is a MOTION, or a COMBINATION OF MOTIONS, or a 
          RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MOTIONS, including INWARD and OUTWARD 
          SCALAR MOTIONS, in the form of TRANSLATIONAL, VIBRATIONAL, 
          ROTATIONAL, or ROTATIONAL-VIBRATIONAL motions. 

               For example, the expansion of the physical universe is 
          simply an OUTWARD SCALAR MOTION, which is an INHERENT 
          PROPERTY of the universe and NOT a result of a "big bang", 
          [which means that "Hubble's Constant", whatever its correct 
          value, can NOT be used to determine the age of the physical 
          universe.]. 
          
               Gravitation is an INWARD SCALAR MOTION that obeys the 
          inverse square law.  MOTION is what makes a homogeneous 
          gravitational field "EQUIVALENT" to a uniformly accelerated 
          reference frame (which is in a certain kind of MOTION). 

               For objects moving at speeds close to the speed of 
          light, acceleration drops toward zero, (a = F/m), NOT because 
          "mass increases toward infinity" (mass really STAYS 
          CONSTANT), but because FORCE decreases toward ZERO (because 
          of the RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MOTIONS of the near-light speed 
          of the object and the OUTWARD SCALAR MOTION of light at the 
          speed of light). 

               In Larson's Theory, the "strong nuclear force" and the 
          "weak nuclear force" DO NOT EXIST.  They are merely AD HOC 
          ASSUMPTIONS, resulting from an ERRONEOUS model of the atom. 
          

               Please read Dewey B. Larson's books "NOTHING BUT MOTION" 
          and "THE UNIVERSE OF MOTION". 


               UN-altered REPRODUCTION and DISSEMINATION of this 
          IMPORTANT Information is ENCOURAGED, ESPECIALLY to COMPUTER 
          BULLETIN BOARDS. 

                                   Robert E. McElwaine
                                   B.S., Physics and Astronomy, UW-EC