THE BIG FLUSH (parallel dimensional equilibrium theory)
by Rick Finney.

All the detail contained herein 
- excluding the original photograph of Galaxy N1499 - 
are copyright of/to Richard V Finney, April 12th, 1995. 
They may not be reproduced in part or full in any medium 
- audio, visual or data -
without the prior written permission of the author (Richard V Finney).

Contents:  >>Flush.zip<<.
1. Flush.TXT ... This file, explaining the theory.
2. PDS1.GIF ... Illustration #1.
3. PDS2.GIF ... Illustration #2.
4. PDS3.GIF ... Illustration #3.
5. PDS4.GIF ... Illustration #4.

The Big Flush ... an alternative (3rd) theory of cosmic reality and creation.

Introduction.
   For starters ... I believe in GOD and beyond that I do not speculate about GOD's nature, because the mind that created the universe and cosmos is miles beyond my feeble capacity. Rather than waste time trying to marvel about GOD, I marvel about GOD's creations instead. It is far more constructive and far less stressful.

   I am aware of the two existing theories of cosmic creation, the most popular of which is the "Big Bang" theory. I refer to these theories as "cosmic creation theory" - not "creation theory", because none can explain the origin of the first 'vacuum', 'bit of cosmic dust', triggering force, or whatever ... that started each theory off in the first place. Until they do, it cannot be correctly referred as a general "creation theory" and is definitively limited to "cosmic creation theory".

   In my terminology "Cosmic" is the material and dimensions of the known universe (cosmos), nominally constrained by the furthest galaxy we speculate exists and all things within that furthest parameter.

   The problem I have with the existing theories is that they are light-on for visible (concrete) supporting evidence, supported by a regime of designing supporting theories to prove the original - every time a snag comes up, and fairly marginal - in even metaphysic terms - when it comes to explaining direction and universal equilibrium.

   The "Big Flush" differs in providing a visible example (admittedly subject to conceptual speculative interpretation ... but the same applies to the evidence supporting the options) and more importantly offering possible explanations to the questions of "black holes" and "cosmic balance" ... or spatial equilibrium.

    Spatial equilibrium in the real difference. This theory ("Big Flush") allows all known physical realities to be part of a greater cosmic equilibrium; where as the two other theories have us:
a). on an unchartered trip across the cosmos, without clear knowledge of how we started or where we are going or how long before the wheels fall off...; or
b). as above - but on a cosmic yo-yo string, that will reach some speculative optimum point and then wind back to the start.
    I know monkeys who could come up with better theories than that.

   For many years I had speculated on Fermat's last theorem, which I believed I solved and seemed to be about spatial physics. The solution could be applied to closer realities - such as tennis balls - but seemed to suggest a wider application, nominally galaxial spatial physics. It should be stressed that I am into metaphysics - not physics. The former is about speculative conceptualisation, while the latter deals with proofs and provable reality.

   To adapt Fermat's theorem to spatial (galaxial) physics, I needed to look at the possible structure of the universe and/or cosmos, while trying to determine the nature of the matrix (or pattern) of the same. This meant looking (speculatively) at 'fields' - both gravitational and general magnetic (as potential microcosms of the greater). I came to a speculative conclusion that there are six dimensional properties that determine the nature of, and confine, both fields and spatial masses (galaxies are included as a spatial mass, although the majority of their area is vacuum or void).

   In parallel to these speculations, attention was focusing on the "hole in the ozone layer", over the Antarctic; which when asked what I thought - seemed to me to be an irrotational vortex driven by upper atmosphere climatic factors and global thermodynamics.

This is the back ground to the following...

Big Flush theory.

    I believe the cosmos is in a dynamic state of equilibrium, which is balanced by dimensional shifts of matter, through dimensional fields ... or zones of separation.
    
    When there is sufficient material force - by focused mass and perhaps aided by rotational speed of a focused mass (like a drill) - the focus mass gradually stretches and then breaks through the dimensional continuum.

   The focused mass in this dimensional reality will lie at the base axis of a centripetal vortex - that is a vortex drawing matter into it; while the resulting release of matter into a parallel dimension (cosmos/universe) would result in a centrifugal vortex - that is a vortex throwing matter away from its central axis.

   A centripetal vortex might be illustrated by a "Black Hole" (or collapsed sun); while a centrifugal vortex might be illustrated by a galaxial manifestation such as galaxy N 1499.

   Rather than a "Big Bang", I believe the collapsed sun (singularity) at the base of a black hole reaches a critical mass, or critical rotational speed, or both ... and then breaks through one plane/field of the dimensional matrix. At the spatial transition, the rotational nature of the vortex action immediately reverses - as seen on either side of the Earth's planner axis - causing the super compressed matter of the focused mass (singularity) to be then thrown-out from its centre. Thus the effect is perhaps not unlike flushing the toilet - hence the "Big Flush" theory.

   The requisite nature and rotational speed of the focused mass (singularity), would be determined by the balance across the parallel continuums ... basically exchanging matter between each dimensionally determined continuum, in a roughly balancing manner - but not an exact balance across the entire dimensional plane/field separating any two or more continuums.

    The planner (dimensional field) nature of this theory ... suggests an explanation for the directional imbalance (size) in the super particle jet (gamma emissions) emitted by the collapsed sun (singularity) at the base axis of a black hole. These particle jets are many hundreds of times greater on one side of the vertical axis [see diagram] and can be almost undetectable on the other. I believe the non-detectable, or smaller jet indicates the proximity of the dimensional field zone (plane) and the extent to which the focused mass (singularity) is already stretching or imbedded into the same.

   Where there is a detectable (or small) particle jet stream on the opposite plane, I suspect this simply indicates the focused mass (singularity) is not yet in immediate contact with a dimensional field, or zone of separation.

Diagrams.

PDS1.GIF 
        is a cross-sectional representation of the vortex field of a black hole - with the focused mass (collapsed sun or singularity) at the base axis (dark ball). By stages it illustrates what I mean by stretching and imbedding in the dimensional separation zone/plane ... with the speculative displacement pattern that would occur if such was to break-through and reverse its irrotational field parameters (i.e. change from centripetal in nature, to centrifugal in nature).

   Such an event would seem like a "Big Bang" (and it would be a beauty) but it is an instantaneous tearing apart - possibly followed by a number of "bangs" in the first instance.

PDS2.GIF 
        is illustrations of the recovery of the dimensional separation zone/plane after such an event ... indicating where the trans-dimensional rift (or passage) would be.

   By "navigable" - I mean you could see it and find it, if you were driving a space ship and wished to cross the dimensional gap. 
By "leakage" - I mean where the material crossed from one dimension to another. In this cosmic zone, in both dimensions, I believe there would be relative equilibrium and there would not be a further leakage from one continuum to the other, after the initial event; however I believe the passage could be navigated by something that wished to go through it (supplying its own power/thrust - i.e. a space craft).

PDS3.GIF
        is a picture of the N1499 galaxy (thank you whoever took this picture originally, scanned it and uploaded it), with a detail of cross-section #6 from PDS1.GIF. Please note that the N1499 galaxy matches the material distribution projection, that was completed four months before I found this picture. The "mushrooming" on the central axis would be caused by the greater central thrust effect (central material intertia), as the "singularity" broke through the dimensional field and immediately before it tore itself apart (split second).

   I was very surprised when I saw this picture, because I was not totally sure the "singularity" would spread as I had assumed.

PDS4.GIF
        is another diagram of N1499, indicating key points of interest. The null spot (#7) is consistent with what I think might happen, were an even like this to occur in proximity to a large solar system, cosmic mass, or small galaxy. It would create a "shadow", even as it got absorbed in the over-all explosion/event, slightly altering the distribution pattern. 

   Next time you pull the plug in the bath, sit there and watch the drain hole. When the bath is almost fully drained and you can see the vortex (water head vortex) ... put your little finger in it. You will see a distribution 'shadow' on the opposite side of your finger, to the spiral direction of the vortex. It will be very similar to, or identical to, this 'shadow' in the N1499 galaxy.

Note. The diagrams of N1499 have been rotated slightly (about 11 degrees) clockwise, so it is easier to compare to the cross-sectional illustrations in PDS1 and PDS2.

Thoughts...

   This is not finished by a long shot, which I will explain in a moment, but I thought it might interest people and stimulate some conversation. I could not guarantee I would be around to present it later, when more material had been collected, so it is presented as is.

   I am not a physicist, but will happily talk to people who wish to express a thought or view. In a population of 1 million - over 999,990 would probably be better able to develop on this detail than I am.

My CompuServe address is: 100250,3510. 

   Postal (land mail) is: PO Box 76.,
                          COMO  W.A. 6152.
                           [Australia]

Profession ...

   I am a people's advocate (easiest explanation) and investigate/expose corruption and/or corrupt practice in various places - nominally associated to politicians. 

   I am currently in the process of presenting considerable amounts of damaging detail to a Commission on Government in Western Australia. While the detail presented thus far is extremely damaging to a number of political and executive figures, there is a considerable amount that is yet to be presented in coming months ... which is a lot worse (for those corrupt politicians/executives involved). The latter are a number of Ministers of State.

   The reality is that it is improbable all the testimony and evidence in question will be allowed to be delivered; while people familiar with such exercises will appreciate what I am saying.

   I feel the "Big Flush" theory has elements worthy of discussion and is a credible alternative theory on the cosmic continuum. While I could, I wanted to present it ... even though it is not really finished.

   Please feel free to 'sling-shot' (disseminate to your local BBS) "Flush.zip". The 'copyright' is more a message to journals and academics, than applicable to the general public. 

Thank you...


RICK.

p.s. Well at least these days when the telephone rings, I know it is not my insurance agent trying to get me to take-out more cover. :-)